filed in Car Accidents

Rear-end Collision Causes Dissection of Carotid Artery

Synopsis

Plaintiff was stopped at a red light when he was rear-ended by an inattentive driver. Plaintiff suffered from whiplash and resulting neck pain and headache following the collision. Three months after the collision, plaintiff suffered a stroke and doctor’s discovered that he had sustained damage to his carotid artery in the collision.

Plaintiff Allegations

Plaintiff sued the inattentive driver that rear-ended him for negligence. Plaintiff argued that the forces of the accident caused damage to his carotid artery that eventually led to the dissection of the artery and resulting stroke.

Defendant Allegations

Liability was uncontested, but medical causation was contested given the passage of time between the collision and plaintiff’s stroke. Defendant argued that the dissection of the carotid artery and resulting stroke was spontaneous and unrelated to the rear-end collision.

Injuries/Damages

Plaintiff sustained damage to his right internal carotid artery in the collision. The damage to his artery led to an eventual dissection of the carotid artery within three months following the collision. The dissection caused plaintiff to suffer a stroke. The effects of plaintiff’s stroke include permanent partial hearing loss, problems with spatial orientation, facial asymmetry, decreased focus and impact on multitasking abilities. Medical treatment included surgery to correct the artery, physical therapy, and occupational therapy. Plaintiff also sustained a substantial wage loss.

Result

Parties settled for $500,000, the full value of insurance available for this loss.

About

Powered by proven attorneys with decades of trial experience, Veen Firm is a go-to firm for complex injury cases in San Francisco Bay Area.

Free Case Evaluation

Get started with Veen Firm in 3 steps.

1Call, text, or fill out the webform for a free case evaluation.

2You'll speak with a Veen Firm team member who's ready to help.

3If we can help, you’ll work with one of our award-winning attorneys.

Case Evaluation Webform

"I had the privilege of working with Theo Emison after being turned down by nearly 30 other attorneys. Thank you for your unwavering dedication, compassion, and belief in justice.

Harvin Ferrer

Veen Firm Client

The information contained on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this site or contacting us through it. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Veen Firm 2026